Please watch this 30 minute presentation by Lt Col Theresa Long as it is harrowing and hard to deny.
This is happening all around the developed world. Because we are the greatest threat, the most educated and capable of retaliation. The most capable to organize ourselves and fight back. If we are not able to fight or prepare. The rest of the world has next to no chance. The time to act is as early as possible. The earliest influences, even small ones can make massive changes to the outcome down the line. Watch. Learn. Think. Act.
Bio warfare blues
Another thought to consider is how to make a weapon that doesn't raise suspicions. Or if it does, will take too long for the alarms to be raised that by the time they are raised... Most will be infected by the weapon?
With the known risks associated with the vaccine design. Eg a shotgun type effect of different biological mechanisms.
First off, most adverse events will be delayed by years. Meaning exposure won't trip off many alarms. If we dropped dead quickly uptake would not be feasible.
Secondly lightning seldomly strikes twice in the same place... So many mechanisms mean most doctors on a case by case basis won't see a pattern emerging. Cancer here. Dementia there. Heart attack. They seem unrelated.
Thirdly. Create distrust and break social cohesion. This way people won't even listen to the raised alarm without attacking those who raised it.
See the pattern emerging?
When managing risks. My advice is simple and is field tested.
First you must consider the most significant hazards or risks known. No matter how likely or unlikely. And establish controls to eliminate or otherwise minimize those particular hazards.
Secondly you consider the most common or expected hazards and risks. And do the same for those.
Thirdly you consider the remainder of the hazards and risks. And develop processes for them.
By mitigating the most catastrophic hazards and the most common hazards you can most effectively reduce the risk to the whole. With the least effort or force. It is somewhat like the use of the 80:20 rule but employed for risk management purposes.
In our current climate. What do you think is the most significant or catastrophic risk? And what safeguards do we have available to prevent or otherwise minimize those hazards? Is it getting better and easier or harder and more difficult? Because I think it is the latter. But that all makes sense if the plan was to deny the ability to mitigate the impact.